BIOACTIVE AND FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF FISH PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE FROM LEIOGNATHUS BINDUS

Authors

  • JOHNROSE PRABHA Loyola College
  • Savariar Vincent
  • Swapna Joseph
  • Joacy Magdalene

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2016.v9i5.14002

Abstract

Objective: The present work is focused on the production of biologically active protein hydrolysate from low value by-catch fish, Leiognathus bindus;
this will be an ideal approach to exploit the underutilized fish to develop a highly nutritious bioactive product. Moreover, fish protein hydrolysates
have a broad spectrum of applications ranging from high-value peptones to food ingredients with special functional properties.

Methods: The protein hydrolysate was prepared from L. bindus through acidic autolysis processes. The proximate composition, physico-functional,
and biochemical properties of hydrolysate and control samples were characterized by standard protocols. Molecular profiling was done by sodium
dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography analysis performed to identify the essential amino
acid composition in protein hydrolysate.

Results: The results of this study reveals that the protein hydrolysate obtained from the trash fish has relatively high protein (71.01±0.2%) and low
lipid (1.57±0.1%) content. The molecular analysis shows low molecular weight peptides are obtained in the hydrolyzed samples which indicate high
protein solubility confirmed to have the potential application as an ingredient in the balanced human diet. The chemical score of the hydrolysate
indicates that it fulfills adult human nutritional requirements.

Conclusion: This approach also offers the relatively simple and cost-effective process to improve the nutritional characteristics and functional properties of foodstuff, also an opportunity for the conversion of waste fish resources to nutritious products, that can be used in food and pharmaceutical industries.

Keywords: Protein hydrolysate, Emulsifying property, Bioactive, Peptides, Amino acid, Chemical score.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department; 2009. p. 176.

Davies RW, Cripps SJ, Nickson A, Porter G. Defining and estimating global marine fisheries bycatch. Mar Policy 2009;33:661-72.

Funge-Smith S, Lindebo E, Staples D. Asian Fisheries Today; The Production and Use of Low Value/Trash Fish7 From Marine Fisheries in Asia-Pacific Region. Bangkok: Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations, Regional office Asia and Pacific; 2005. p. 38.

Murueta JH, Toro MA, Carreno FG. Concentrates of fish protein from bycatch SPS produced by drying processes. Food Chem 2007;100:705-11.

Curran V, Casimiro L, Banfield V, Hall P, Lackie K, Simmons B, et al. Research for interprofessional competency-based evaluation (RICE). J Interprof Care 2009;23(3):297-300.

Klompong V, Benjakul S, Kantachote D, Shahidi F. Antioxidative activity and functional properties of protein hydrolysate of yellow stripe trevally as influenced by degree of hydrolysis and enzyme type. Food Chem 2007;102(4):1317-27.

Hoyle NT, Merritt JH. Quality of fish protein hydrolysates from herring (Clupea harengus). J Food Sci 1994;59(129):76-9.

Foh MB, Kamara MT, Amadou I, Wenshui X. Chemical and physicochemical properties of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fish protein hydrolysate and concentration. Int J Biol Chem 2011;5(1):21-36.

Gildberg A. Recovery of proteinases and protein hydrolysates from fish viscera. Bio Technol 1992;39:271-6.

Saritha K, Patterson J. Innovative seafood health mix powder juveniles of Leiognathus sp. And their quality for human consumption. World J Dairy Food Sci 2014;9(2):113-20.

AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Washington, D.C: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2002.

Kunitz M. Crystalline soybean trypsin inhibitor: II. General properties. J Gen Physiol 1947;30(4):291-310.

Walter HE. Proteins methods with hemoglobin, casein and azocoll as substrates. In: Bergmeyer HU, editor. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Vol. 5. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie; 1984. p. 270-7.

Coffman CW, Garcia V. Functional properties and amino acid content of protein isolate form mung bean flour. J Food Technol 1977;12:473-84.

Beuchat LR. Functional and electrophoretic characteristic of succinylated peanut flour protein. J Agric Food Chem 1977;25(2):258-61.

Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227(5259):680-5.

Ovissipour M, Abedian AM, Motamedzadegan A, Rasco B, Safari R, Shahiri H. The effect of enzymatic hydrolysis time and temperature on the properties of protein hydrolysates from the Persian sturgeon viscera. Food Chem 2009;115(1):238-42.

FAO/WHO. Protein quality evaluation. Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1990.

NRC. National Research Council Nutrient Requirements of Fish. Washington: National Academy of Sciences; 1993. p. 124.

Shahidi F. Extraction and measurement of total lipids. Curr Protoc Food Anal Chem 2001;D1:1.1-11.

Aspmo SI, Horn SJ, Eijsink VG. Enzymatic hydrolysis of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) Viscera. Process Biochem 2005;40(5):1957-66.

Samaranayaka AG, Kitts DD, Li-Chan EC. Antioxidative and angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory potential of a Pacific hake (Merluccius productus) fish protein hydrolysate subjected to simulated gastrointestinal digestion and Caco-2 cell permeation. J Agric Food Chem 2010;58(3):1535-42.

Kristinsson HG, Rasco BA. Fish protein hydrolysates: Production, biochemical, and functional properties. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2000;40(1):43-81.

Bhaskar N, Benila T, Radha C, Lalitha RG. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of visceral waste proteins of Catla (Catla catla) for preparing protein hydrolysate using a commercial protease. Bioresour Technol 2008;99(2):335-43.

Nemati M, Javadian SR, Ovissipour M, Keshavarz M. A study on the properties of Alosa (Alosa caspia) by-products protein hydrolysates using commercial enzymes. World Appl Sci J 2012;18(7):950-6.

Prabha J, Narikimelli A, Sajini MI, Vincent S. Optimization for autolysis assisted production of fish protein hydrolysate from underutilized fish Pellona dicthela. Int J Sci Eng Res 2013;4(11):1863-70.

Motamedzadegan A, Davarniam B, Asadi G, Abedian A, Ovissipour M. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares viscera using neutrase. Int Aquat Res 2010;2(3):173-81.

Ovissipour M, Rasco B, Shiroodi SG, Modanlow M, Gholami S, Nemati M. Antioxidant activity of protein hydrolysates from whole anchovy sprat (Clupeonella engrauliformis) prepared using endogenous enzymes and commercial proteases. J Sci Food Agric 2013;93(7):1718-26.

Souissi N, Bougatef A, Triki-Ellouz Y, Nasri M. Biochemical and functional properties (Sardinella aurita) byproduct hydrolysate. Food Technol Biotechnol 2007;45(2):187-94.

Amiza MA, Kong YL, Faazaz AL. Effects of degree of hydrolysis on physicochemical properties of Cobia (Rachycentron canadum) frame hydrolysate. Int Food Res J 2012;19(1):199-06.

Barrett D. From natural products to clinically useful antifungals. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002;1587(2-3):224-33.

Chen YQ, Edwards IJ, Kridel SJ, Thornburg T, Berquin IM. Dietary fat-gene interactions in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2007;26(3-4):535-51.

Yin H, Pu J, Wan Y, Xiang B, Bechtel PJ, Sathivel S. Rheological and functional properties of catfish skin protein hydrolysates. J Food Sci 2010;75(1):E11-7.

Foegeding EA, Luck PJ, Davis JP. Factors determining the physical properties of protein foams. Food Hydrocoll 2006;20(2-3):284-92.

Samaranayaka AG, Li-Chan EC. Autolysis-assisted production of fish protein hydrolysates with antioxidant properties from Pacific hake (Merluccius productus). Food Chem 2008;107(2):768-76.

Song R, Wei RB, Luo HY, Yang ZS. Isolation and identification of an antiproliferative peptide derived from heated products of peptic hydrolysates of half-fin anchovy (Setipinna taty). J Funct Foods 2014;10:104-11.

Gashti AB, Prakash HS. Characterization of antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of Indian salmon (Eleutheronema tetradactylum) protein hydrolysates. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2016;8(5):102-8.

Nesse KO, Nagalakshmi AP, Marimuthu P, Singh M. Efficacy of a fish protein hydrolysate in malnourished children. Indian J Clin Biochem 2011;26(4):360-5.

Khora SS. Marine fish-derived bioactive peptides and proteins for human therapeutics. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2013;5(3):31-7.

Table 2: Comparison amino acid composition and chemical score in FPH (g/100 g) with FAO/WHO and NRC reference protein Amino acid FPH RP1 RP2 Chemical score (Adult)a (Poultry)b RP1 RP2 Arginine 1.22 0.7 1.74Threonine 1.91 0.9 0.47 2.1 4.06 Tyrosine 0.32 ‑‑‑‑ Valine 1.83 1.3 0.7 1.4 2.61 Methionine 1.81 1.7 0.3 1.06 6.03 Phenylalanine 2.22 3.8 0.83c 0.58 2.67 Isoleucine 1.78 1.3 0.65 1.33 2.06 Leucine 2.37 1.9 0.82 1.24 2.89 Lysine 2.99 1.6 0.69 1.86 4.33 Histidine1.92 1.6 0.171.2 11.29 Alanine 1.21 Aspartic acid 0.72 Glutamic acid 2.14 Serine 2.14 Glycine 0.98 RP1: Chemical score calculated with FAO/WHO reference protein as the base. RP2: Chemical score calculated with amino acid requirements as per NRC (1993). aSuggested EAA profile requirements in adults (FAO/WHO, 1990). bEAA requirements for poultry, according to NRC (1993). FPH: Fish protein hydrolysate, EAA: Essential amino acid

Published

01-09-2016

How to Cite

JOHNROSE PRABHA, S. Vincent, S. Joseph, and J. Magdalene. “BIOACTIVE AND FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF FISH PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE FROM LEIOGNATHUS BINDUS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 9, no. 5, Sept. 2016, pp. 277-81, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2016.v9i5.14002.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)