EVALUATION OF WARFARIN ORAL USED BY INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO VALUE AND DETERMINATION FREQUENCY TO CARDIOVASCULAR PATIENT AT HAJI ADAM MALIK GENERAL HOSPITAL, MEDAN, INDONESIA

Authors

  • Dewi Pertiwi Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sumatera Utara, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia.
  • Edy Suwarso Department of Cardiovascular, Medical Faculty, University of Sumatera Utara, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia.
  • Parlindungan Manik Department of Cardiovascular, Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i4.23600

Keywords:

Warfarin, International normalized ratio, Cardiovascular, Hospital

Abstract

 Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate of warfarin oral used by value and determination frequency of international normalized ratio (INR).

Methods: The data of cardiovascular patients were collected from medical records in Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia, in 2016. This study evaluated the data by retrospective study design. The sample study was selected by Slovin method from the population of medical record of cardiovascular patients who received warfarin therapy. The sample of population was divided based on how many times the INR was measured. The groups are no measurement, once a year, unregularly schedule, thrice a year, and every month. The data were analyzed by analysis of variant to evaluated association of INR values and groups of patients.

Result: The total sample in this study was 90 patients based on Slovin formula. The percentage of patient who never gets INR checked was 18.89%, once a year was 32.2%, unregularly was 34.44%, thrice a year was 8.89%, and every month was 5.56%. The value of INR in groups was 0.00 ± 0.00 in never checked group, once in year was 1.18 ± 0.44, unregularly was 1.79 ± 1.00, once time in 3 months was 2.04 ± 0.73, and every month was 2.42 ± 0.91. The groups of patients with never evaluation of INR value were significantly different with the other groups (p≤0.05).

Conclusion: The results obtained in this study indicated the majority patients group in case of warfarin oral used and evaluation of bleeding status were once checked in year and unregularly determination of INR value. The best condition, in this case, was the determination of INR value in every month caused the bleeding or coagulation status of patient can be evaluated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kaya B, Yildiz I, Baha RM, Zeytun NE, Yetisgen A. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage associated with warfarin therapy. Case Rep Med 2015;350532:1-3.

Zeichner SB, Cavalcante M, Barkin JA. Suplement use and gastrointestinal bleeding. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2014;7:194-201.

Suliburska J. Pharmacological treatment may impair mineral status in blood. Int J Blood Res Disord 2014;1:1-2.

Kimble MA, Young LY, Alldredge BK, Corelli RL, Guglielmo BJ, Kradjan WA, editors. Applied Terapeutics: The Clinical Use Of Drugs. 9th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

Shanmugapriya S, Bhuvanseswari K, Rashmi K. A study on the effect of low molecular weigth on potasium homeostasis in patients administered heparin for thrombophrophylaxis in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;9:85-9.

Guerroujj M, Uppal CS, Alklabi A, Douketis JD. The clinical impact of bleeding during oral anticoagulant therapy: Assessment of morbidity, mortality and post-bleed anticoagulant management. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011;31:419-23.

Panduranga P, Al-Mukhaini M, Al-Muslahi M, Haque MA, Shehab A. Management dilemmas in patients with mechanical heart valves and warfarin-induced major bleeding. World J Cardiol 2012;4:54-9.

Linkins LA, Choi PT, Douketis JD. Clinical impact of bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:893-900.

Kasinathan G, Pairan S, Rowther S, Sulaiman S, Basimin SA, Norazema S, et al. Efficacy of point-of-care testing (POCT) in reducing total waiting time at warfarin clinic of a district hospital: A cohort study. Open Access Libr J 2016;3:1-7.

Mathew E, Chandrika C, Karanath PM, Srinavasa R. Aprospective observational study on prescribing trends and adverse drug reactions in stroke patients. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;9:25-30

Thiese MS. Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochem Med 2014;24:199-210.

Smeltzer SC, Bare BG. Buku Ajar Keperawatan Medikal Bedah Brunner dan Suddart. Jakarta: EGC; 2002.

Notoatmojo S. Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2005.

Department of Health. Guideline for Warfarin Management in the Community. Queensland Government: Royal Flying Doctor Service; 2016.

Chedepudi PR, Mounika O, Chandrika G, Franklin A, Ramesh M, Vanitha RN, et al. Impact of pharmacist led anticoagulation monitoring and patient education on oral anticoagulation therapy with Acenocouarol. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:314-7.

Christopher A, Sweet M. Assessing anticoaguation safety and efficacy in antiphospholipid syndrome patients monitored by factor II activity assay. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:398-401.

PERKI. Pedoman Tata LaksanaFibrilasi Atrium. 1st ed. Jakarta: Centra Communications; 2015.

Published

01-04-2018

How to Cite

Pertiwi, D., E. Suwarso, and P. Manik. “EVALUATION OF WARFARIN ORAL USED BY INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO VALUE AND DETERMINATION FREQUENCY TO CARDIOVASCULAR PATIENT AT HAJI ADAM MALIK GENERAL HOSPITAL, MEDAN, INDONESIA”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 11, no. 4, Apr. 2018, pp. 324-6, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i4.23600.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)