DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF STABILITY INDICATING REVERSE-PHASE HIGHPERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS QUANTIFICATION OF SAQUINAVIR, RITONAVIR, AND AMPRENAVIR

Authors

  • Mangamma Kuna Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, JNTU-K and PhD Research Scholar, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Gowri Sankar Dannana Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Quality Assurance, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i6.25205

Keywords:

Saquinavir, Ritonavir, Amprenavir, HIV, Stress Degradation, Analysis

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to develop and validate a sensitive, precise, and accurate stability indicating reverse-phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatography method for the quantification of saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir simultaneously.

Methods: The determination of saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir in their mixtures was done using a mobile phase consisted of 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 3.5) and methanol (70:30, v/v). The method is based on the simultaneous separation of studied drugs in a RP Inertsil ODS C18 (4.6 mm×100 mm, 5 μm) column at ambient temperature. Detection and quantitation were achieved with photodiode array detector set at 260 nm.

Results: Saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir showed linearity over a concentration range of 40–200 μg/ml (R2-0.9994), 20–100 μg/ml (R2-0.9992), and 30–150 μg/ml (R2-0.9990), respectively. The limit of quantification was 0.64 μg/ml, 0.57 μg/ml, and 0.53 μg/ml for saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir, respectively. The accuracies for the three drugs were in the range of 99.40–100.53% (saquinavir), 99.45-100.47% (ritonavir), and 100.03–100.53% (amprenavir). The percentage relative standard deviations for the studied drugs were 0.785–0.848% (saquinavir), 0.338–0.499% (ritonavir), and 0.336–0.775% (amprenavir). No peaks were observed at the retention time of saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir in placebo blank, mobile phase blank and stress degraded samples which suggested that the proposed was selective and specific.

Conclusion: The method was found to be suitable for the regular analysis of saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir simultaneously in the presence of their stress degradation products.

Objective: The objective of the study was to develop and validate a sensitive, precise, and accurate stability indicating reverse-phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatography method for the quantification of saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir simultaneously.

Methods: The determination of saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir in their mixtures was done using a mobile phase consisted of 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 3.5) and methanol (70:30, v/v). The method is based on the simultaneous separation of studied drugs in a RP Inertsil ODS C18 (4.6 mm×100 mm, 5 μm) column at ambient temperature. Detection and quantitation were achieved with photodiode array detector set at 260 nm.

Results: Saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir showed linearity over a concentration range of 40–200 μg/ml (R2-0.9994), 20–100 μg/ml (R2-0.9992), and 30–150 μg/ml (R2-0.9990), respectively. The limit of quantification was 0.64 μg/ml, 0.57 μg/ml, and 0.53 μg/ml for saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir, respectively. The accuracies for the three drugs were in the range of 99.40–100.53% (saquinavir), 99.45-100.47% (ritonavir), and 100.03–100.53% (amprenavir). The percentage relative standard deviations for the studied drugs were 0.785–0.848% (saquinavir), 0.338–0.499% (ritonavir), and 0.336–0.775% (amprenavir). No peaks were observed at the retention time of saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir in placebo blank, mobile phase blank and stress degraded samples which suggested that the proposed was selective and specific.

Conclusion: The method was found to be suitable for the regular analysis of saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir simultaneously in the presence of their stress degradation products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Saquinavir. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Archived from the original on 2015-09-08; 2006. Available from: http://www.drugs.com/monograph/saquinavir.html. [Last retrieved on 2015 Sep 05].

Vella S, Floridia M. Saquinavir clinical pharmacology and efficacy. Clin Pharm 1998;34:189-201.

La Porte CJ. Saquinavir, the pioneer antiretroviral protease inhibitor. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2009;5:1313-22.

Ritonavir. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Archived from the original on 2015-10-17; 2013. Available from: https://www.drugs.com/monograph/ritonavir.html. [Last retrieved on 2015 Oct 23].

Hull MW, Montaner JS. Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV therapy. Ann Med 2011;43:375-88.

Zeldin RK, Petruschke RA. Pharmacological and therapeutic properties of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor therapy in HIV-infected patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;53:4-9.

Agenerase (amprenavir) capsules. Full Prescribing Information. Section Dosage and Administration (PDF). US Food and Drug Administration. GlaxoSmithKline and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2005. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2002/21007s11,21039s10lbl.pdf. [Last retrieved on 2015 Nov 29].

Fung HB, Kirschenbaum HL, Hameed R. Amprenavir: A new human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 protease inhibitor. Clin Ther 2000;22:549-72.

Ishizawa M, Komatsu H. Pharmacological study and clinical effect of HIV protease inhibitor amprenavir. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi 2001;117:59-64.

International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceutical for Human use Stability Testing of New Drugs Substance and Products Q1A (R2); 2003.

International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Q2(R1), Parent Guidelines on Methodology dated November 6; 1996.

The United States Pharmacopoeia 34, the National Formulary 29. Vol. II, III. Rockville, MD: US Pharmacopoeial Convention; 2011; p. 2445, 3782-4608.

Ravichandran V, Shalini S, Sundram KM, Harish R. Validation of analytical methods–strategies and importance. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2010;2:18-22.

Rajendra BP, Tushar AD, Vijay RP. Stability indicating HPLC method for dapoxetine HCl in bulk and in formulation. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;6:687-90.

Published

07-06-2018

How to Cite

Kuna, M., and G. S. Dannana. “DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF STABILITY INDICATING REVERSE-PHASE HIGHPERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS QUANTIFICATION OF SAQUINAVIR, RITONAVIR, AND AMPRENAVIR”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 11, no. 6, June 2018, pp. 390-6, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i6.25205.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)