COMPARISON OF CARTILAGE TYPE IIIA AND IIIB TYMPANOPLASTY IN INDIAN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA

Authors

  • Prashant R Reddy Department of ENT, BGS Gleneagles Global Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Rakesh Vuppala Department of Otolaryngology, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
  • Supriya Bhat Department of ENT, Krishna Eye and ENT hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i12.28781

Keywords:

Air-bone gap, Chronic suppurative otitis media, Hearing improvement, Pure tone audiometry, Tympanoplasty type III

Abstract

Objective: This prospective comparative study determined the efficacy of type III tympanoplasty using homologous septal spur cartilage in patients with chronic otitis medis (COM).

Methods: We selected patients by random sampling. Complete otolaryngologica examination including otological examination, tuning fork tests, pure tone audiometry (PTA), and relevant investigations was done. Post-tympanoplasty residual air-bone gap (ABG) was graded. Type III tympanoplasty was done for all and followed up until month 6.

Results: Of 50 patients, 70.0% were men. Mean age was 27.72±10.81 years, 24 and 26 patients underwent type IIIA and IIIB tympanoplasty, respectively. Pre-operative mean PTA and ABG was 50.08 dB and 38.27 dB, respectively. Pre-operative ABG of 31–60 dB was seen in 41 patients while nine had an ABG of 0–30 dB. Overall, pre- and post-operative PTA was 50.24 dB and 28.54 dB, respectively. Overall, pre- and post-operative ABG was 38.32 dB and 16.40 dB (III A 36.92 dB and 14.79 dB; III B 39.62 dB and 17.88 dB). Mean overall hearing gain postoperatively in PTA was 21.70 dB (type III A 22.33 dB, III B −21.115 dB). Overall, ABG closure was 23.53 dB (type III A 22.333 dB, III B −21.115 dB). None had failure (>30 dB). Good ABG of 10–20 dB was seen in 72% and 78% of patients at month 3 and 6, respectively.

Conclusion: Significant post-operative hearing improvement was seen in both types of tympanoplasty using homologous cartilage graft for ossicular reconstruction. Type III A is better than type IIIB as the stapes superstructure is vital for hearing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Prashant R Reddy, Department of ENT, BGS Gleneagles Global Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Head, Dept of ENT, BGS Gleneagles Global Hospital, Bengaluru, India

Rakesh Vuppala, Department of Otolaryngology, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Associate Professor, Dept of Otolaryngology, Apollo Inst of Medical Sciences & Research, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Supriya Bhat, Department of ENT, Krishna Eye and ENT hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Junior consultant, Krishna Eye and ENT hospital, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. 

References

Luers JC, Hüttenbrink K. Surgical anatomy and pathology of the middle ear. J Anat 2016;228:338-53.

Mehta RP, Ravicz ME, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN. Middle-ear mechanics of Type III tympanoplasty (stapes columella): I. Experimental studies. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:176-85.

Merchant SN, McKenna MJ, Mehta RP, Ravicz ME, Rosowski JJ. Middle ear mechanics of Type III tympanoplasty (stapes columella): II. Clinical studies. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:186-94.

Okada M, Gyo K, Takagi T, Fujiwara T, Takahashi H, Hakuba N, et al. Air-bone gap in ears with a well-repaired tympanic membrane after Type III and Type IV tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014;41:153 9.

Kartush JM. Ossicular chain reconstruction capitulum to malleus. Otolayngol Clin J 1994;27:689-715.

Kiakujori K, Esmaieli M, Faramarzi AS. The result of hearing in patietns treated by surgery due to chronic otitis media. Casp J Int Med 2010;1:138-40.

Chole RA. Use of presculpted, banked cartilage transplants in ossicular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:145-8.

Babu MM, Ramabhadraia AK, Srivastava T. Hearing improvement after Type III tympanoplasty: A prospective observational study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018. Available from: https://www.link. springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12070-018-1283-x. [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 27].

Aoyagi M, Yokota M, Nakamura T, Tojima H, Kanayama R, Fuse T, et al. Effects of aging on hearing results in tympanoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994;511:81-6.

Adhikari B, Ghosh AK, Pal S, Haque F. Clinico-audiological comparison between Classical Type-III tympanoplasty and ossiculoplasty using autograft ossicles in patients with Austin Type A defect. Int J Contemp Med Res 2016;3:2422-5.

Küçükkavruk L, Temügan E, Kaya M, Unsal S, Gumus NM, Yüksel M, et al. Retrospective air bone gap evaluation of patients with tympanic membrane central perforation. Clin Invest Med 2016;39:S39-42.

Gupta S, Kalsotra P. Hearing gain in different types of tympanoplasties. Indian J Otol 2013;19:186-93.

Wiatr M, Wiatr A, Składzień J, Stręk P. Determinants of change in air-bone gap and bone conduction in patients operated on for chronic otitis media. medical science monitor . Int Med J Exp Clin Res 2015;21:2345 51.

Lee WS, Lee JH, Min KK, Cho CH. Correlation between the pure tone audiometry results and the subjective hearing benefit of tympanoplasty. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Sur 2007;50:399-403.

Harvey SA, Lin SY. Double cartilage block ossiculoplasty in chronic ear surgery. Laryngoscope 1999;109:911-4.

Jackson CG, Glasscock ME 3rd, Schwaber MK, Nissen AJ, Christiansen SG, Smith PG. Ossicular chain reconstruction: The TORP and PORP in chronic ear disease. Laryngoscope 1983;93:981-8.

Berenholz LP, Rizer FM, Burkey JM, Schuring AG, Lippy WH. Ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:30-3.

Batra K, Motwani G, Dravid CS. Hydroxylapitite vs. Teflon ossicular prosthesis: Our experience. Indian J Otol 2005;11:12-16.

Dalchow CV, Grün D, Stupp HF. Reconstruction of the ossicular chain with titanium implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:628-30.

O’Reilly RC, Cass SP, Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, Bernat RA, Poznanovic SP. Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: Hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:853-8.

Lu H, Ma H. Long-term effect of the modified Type-III tympanoplasty. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 1994;29:42-4.

Guilbeault J, Rouleau M, Dorion D. Type III tympanoplasties: The Sherbrooke experience. J Otolaryngol 2002;31:336-40.

Shrestha BL, Bhusal CL, Bhattarai H. Comparison of pre and post-operative hearing results in canal wall down mastoidectomy with Type III tympanoplasty. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2008;47:224-7.

Published

07-12-2018

How to Cite

Reddy, P. R., R. Vuppala, and S. Bhat. “COMPARISON OF CARTILAGE TYPE IIIA AND IIIB TYMPANOPLASTY IN INDIAN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 11, no. 12, Dec. 2018, pp. 384-8, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i12.28781.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)